Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 53.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 68.0 TH/s |
| 2,094 W | Power Consumption | 3,420 W |
| 39.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 50.3 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | 11,200.0 kg |
| 7,145 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,669 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th)
Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro
Based on BTC price of $79,081 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). Where it pulls away hardest is 39% better power draw (2,094 vs 3,420 W). The Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro claws back ground on hashrate and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro 28% more hashrate (53.0 vs 68.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 39% better power draw (2,094 vs 3,420 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 21% better efficiency (39.5 vs 50.3 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 15% better weight (9,500 vs 11,200 kg)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro 63% more heat output (7,145 vs 11,669 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 18% more home mining score (26.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $780 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $519 |
| -$3.10 | Daily net profit | -$5.73 |
| -$1,910 | Net after 1 year | -$2,612 |
| -$3,041 | Net after 2 years | -$4,704 |
| -$4,171 | Net after 3 years | -$6,797 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th)Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th)39.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) is more profitable at $-3.10/day compared to $-5.73/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) or the Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) runs at 39.5 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro runs at 50.3 J/TH — a difference of 10.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 21% better efficiency (39.5 vs 50.3 J/TH).