Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer S17 Pro

Antminer S17 Pro

Hashrate 56.0 TH/s Power 2,212 W Efficiency 39.5 J/TH
VS
NerdAxe

NerdAxe

Hashrate 500.0 GH/s Power 12 W Efficiency 24.0 J/TH

Antminer S17 Pro vs NerdAxe

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer S17 Pro Specification NerdAxe
56.0 TH/s Hashrate 500.0 GH/s
2,212 W Power Consumption 12 W
39.5 J/TH Efficiency 24.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 30 dB
9.5 kg Weight 0.2 kg
7,547 BTU/hr BTU Output 41 BTU/hr
84/100 Home Mining Score 70/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer D-Central

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer S17 Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00002577 BTC $2.04
Daily Electricity -$5.31
Daily Profit -$3.27
Monthly -$98.13
Yearly -$1,193.86

NerdAxe

Daily Revenue 0.00000023 BTC $0.02
Daily Electricity -$0.03
Daily Profit -$0.01
Monthly -$0.32
Yearly -$3.87

Based on BTC price of $79,082 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the NerdAxe edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 99% better power draw (2,212.0 vs 12.0 W). The Antminer S17 Pro claws back ground on hashrate and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: NerdAxe — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer S17 Pro and NerdAxe sit on each measurable spec:

  • Antminer S17 Pro 11100% more hashrate (56.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
  • NerdAxe 99% better power draw (2,212.0 vs 12.0 W)
  • NerdAxe 39% better efficiency (39.5 vs 24.0 J/TH)
  • NerdAxe 60% better noise (75.0 vs 30.0 dB)
  • NerdAxe 98% better weight (9.5 vs 0.2 kg)
  • Antminer S17 Pro 18353% more heat output (7,547.3 vs 40.9 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer S17 Pro 20% more home mining score (84.0 vs 70.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Antminer S17 Pro Metric NerdAxe
Upfront cost (MSRP) $69
-$3.27 Daily net profit -$0.01
-$1,194 Net after 1 year -$73
-$2,388 Net after 2 years -$77
-$3,582 Net after 3 years -$81
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer S17 Pro

Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

NerdAxe

24.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Antminer S17 Pro or the NerdAxe?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdAxe is more profitable at $-0.01/day compared to $-3.27/day for the Antminer S17 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Antminer S17 Pro or the NerdAxe better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The NerdAxe is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Antminer S17 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Antminer S17 Pro vs NerdAxe: which fits a residential setup better?

The Antminer S17 Pro scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 70/100 for the NerdAxe). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Antminer S17 Pro and NerdAxe on J/TH?

The Antminer S17 Pro runs at 39.5 J/TH while the NerdAxe runs at 24.0 J/TH — a difference of 15.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 39% better efficiency (39.5 vs 24.0 J/TH).