Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) vs Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 64.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 88.0 TH/s |
| 2,880 W | Power Consumption | 3,344 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 38.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 10,500.0 kg | Weight | 14,200.0 kg |
| 9,827 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,410 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th)
Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)
Based on BTC price of $79,146 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 38% more hashrate (64.0 vs 88.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)'s favour. The Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) holds the edge in power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) and Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) 38% more hashrate (64.0 vs 88.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) 14% better power draw (2,880 vs 3,344 W)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) 16% better efficiency (45.0 vs 38.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) 26% better weight (10,500 vs 14,200 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) 16% more heat output (9,827 vs 11,410 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $5,149 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $596 |
| -$4.58 | Daily net profit | -$4.82 |
| -$6,821 | Net after 1 year | -$2,355 |
| -$8,493 | Net after 2 years | -$4,115 |
| -$10,165 | Net after 3 years | -$5,874 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)38.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) or Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) is more profitable at $-4.58/day compared to $-4.82/day for the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) vs Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) or Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) and Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) runs at 45.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) runs at 38.0 J/TH — a difference of 7.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 16% better efficiency (45.0 vs 38.0 J/TH).