Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 741
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 741 |
|---|---|---|
| 64.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 7.3 TH/s |
| 2,880 W | Power Consumption | 1,150 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 157.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 10,500.0 kg | Weight | 4,300.0 kg |
| 9,827 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,924 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th)
Canaan AvalonMiner 741
Based on BTC price of $79,110 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) wins on 2 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 777% more hashrate (64.0 vs 7.3 TH/s). The Canaan AvalonMiner 741 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner 741 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) 777% more hashrate (64.0 vs 7.3 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 741 60% better power draw (2,880 vs 1,150 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) 71% better efficiency (45.0 vs 157.5 J/TH)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 741 59% better weight (10,500 vs 4,300 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) 150% more heat output (9,827 vs 3,924 BTU/hr)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 741 41% more home mining score (22.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 741 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,149 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$4.58 | Daily net profit | -$2.49 |
| -$6,821 | Net after 1 year | -$910 |
| -$8,494 | Net after 2 years | -$1,821 |
| -$10,166 | Net after 3 years | -$2,731 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan AvalonMiner 741Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th)45.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) or the Canaan AvalonMiner 741?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner 741 is more profitable at $-2.49/day compared to $-4.58/day for the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 741: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 741: which fits a residential setup better?
The Canaan AvalonMiner 741 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 741: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) runs at 45.0 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 741 runs at 157.5 J/TH — a difference of 112.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 71% better efficiency (45.0 vs 157.5 J/TH).