Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) vs Whatsminer M30S++
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) | Specification | Whatsminer M30S++ |
|---|---|---|
| 95.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 112.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Power Consumption | 3,472 W |
| 34.2 J/TH | Efficiency | 31.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 14,500.0 kg | Weight | 12.0 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,847 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)
Whatsminer M30S++
Based on BTC price of $79,086 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Whatsminer M30S++ comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 18% more hashrate (95.0 vs 112.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) claws back ground on power consumption and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) and Whatsminer M30S++ sit on each measurable spec:
- Whatsminer M30S++ 18% more hashrate (95.0 vs 112.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 6% better power draw (3,250 vs 3,472 W)
- Whatsminer M30S++ 9% better efficiency (34.2 vs 31.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M30S++ 100% better weight (14,500.0 vs 12.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M30S++ 7% more heat output (11,089 vs 11,847 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M30S++ 64% more home mining score (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) | Metric | Whatsminer M30S++ |
|---|---|---|
| $215 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,300 |
| -$4.34 | Daily net profit | -$4.26 |
| -$1,800 | Net after 1 year | -$3,854 |
| -$3,385 | Net after 2 years | -$5,407 |
| -$4,970 | Net after 3 years | -$6,961 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M30S++Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M30S++31.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) or the Whatsminer M30S++?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M30S++ is more profitable at $-4.26/day compared to $-4.34/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) vs Whatsminer M30S++: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M30S++ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) or the Whatsminer M30S++?
The Whatsminer M30S++ scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) and Whatsminer M30S++?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) runs at 34.2 J/TH while the Whatsminer M30S++ runs at 31.0 J/TH — a difference of 3.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 9% better efficiency (34.2 vs 31.0 J/TH).