Antminer S19 Hydro vs Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S19 Hydro | Specification | Antminer Slim Edition (S9) |
|---|---|---|
| 158.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 12.0 TH/s |
| 5,451 W | Power Consumption | 1,100 W |
| 34.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 91.7 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Noise Level | 65 dB |
| 15.2 kg | Weight | 3.5 kg |
| 18,599 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,753 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 52/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S19 Hydro
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
Based on BTC price of $79,163 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer S19 Hydro comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 1217% more hashrate (158.0 vs 12.0 TH/s). That said, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer S19 Hydro and Antminer Slim Edition (S9) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer S19 Hydro 1217% more hashrate (158.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 80% better power draw (5,451 vs 1,100 W)
- Antminer S19 Hydro 62% better efficiency (34.5 vs 91.7 J/TH)
- Antminer S19 Hydro 23% better noise (50.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 77% better weight (15.2 vs 3.5 kg)
- Antminer S19 Hydro 396% more heat output (18,599 vs 3,753 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 18% more home mining score (44.0 vs 52.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer S19 Hydro | Metric | Antminer Slim Edition (S9) |
|---|---|---|
| $5,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $350 |
| -$7.15 | Daily net profit | -$2.19 |
| -$7,609 | Net after 1 year | -$1,149 |
| -$10,217 | Net after 2 years | -$1,948 |
| -$12,826 | Net after 3 years | -$2,747 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)Score: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S19 Hydro34.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer S19 Hydro or Antminer Slim Edition (S9) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.19/day compared to $-7.15/day for the Antminer S19 Hydro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer S19 Hydro or Antminer Slim Edition (S9)?
The Antminer S19 Hydro is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) at 65 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer S19 Hydro or the Antminer Slim Edition (S9)?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 44/100 for the Antminer S19 Hydro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer S19 Hydro and Antminer Slim Edition (S9) on J/TH?
The Antminer S19 Hydro runs at 34.5 J/TH while the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) runs at 91.7 J/TH — a difference of 57.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 62% better efficiency (34.5 vs 91.7 J/TH).