Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) |
|---|---|---|
| 110.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 134.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Power Consumption | 2,881 W |
| 29.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 21.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 13,200.0 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,830 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)
Based on BTC price of $79,032 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) edges it: 3 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption). Where it pulls away hardest is 27% better efficiency (29.6 vs 21.5 J/TH). The Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) claws back ground on price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) and Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 22% more hashrate (110 vs 134 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 11% better power draw (3,250 vs 2,881 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 27% better efficiency (29.6 vs 21.5 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 100% better weight (13,200.0 vs 14.4 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 13% more heat output (11,089 vs 9,830 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) |
|---|---|---|
| $360 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $483 |
| -$3.80 | Daily net profit | -$2.04 |
| -$1,747 | Net after 1 year | -$1,228 |
| -$3,134 | Net after 2 years | -$1,973 |
| -$4,520 | Net after 3 years | -$2,718 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)21.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) or the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) is more profitable at $-2.04/day compared to $-3.80/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s): which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) and Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) runs at 29.6 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) runs at 21.5 J/TH — a difference of 8.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 27% better efficiency (29.6 vs 21.5 J/TH).