Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 198.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 63.0 TH/s |
| 5,445 W | Power Consumption | 3,276 W |
| 27.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 52.0 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 12,800.0 kg |
| 18,578 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,178 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd
Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro
Based on BTC price of $79,082 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 214% more hashrate (198.0 vs 63.0 TH/s). The Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro claws back ground on power consumption and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd and Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd 214% more hashrate (198.0 vs 63.0 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro 40% better power draw (5,445 vs 3,276 W)
- Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd 47% better efficiency (27.5 vs 52.0 J/TH)
- Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd 100% better weight (15.0 vs 12,800.0 kg)
- Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd 66% more heat output (18,578 vs 11,178 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd 100% more home mining score (44.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $6,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,150 |
| -$5.86 | Daily net profit | -$5.57 |
| -$8,140 | Net after 1 year | -$3,183 |
| -$10,280 | Net after 2 years | -$5,216 |
| -$12,419 | Net after 3 years | -$7,249 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S19 Pro+ HydScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd27.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro is more profitable at $-5.57/day compared to $-5.86/day for the Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd or Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro?
The Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd and Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro?
The Antminer S19 Pro+ Hyd runs at 27.5 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro runs at 52.0 J/TH — a difference of 24.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 47% better efficiency (27.5 vs 52.0 J/TH).