Antminer S19 XP Hyd vs Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S19 XP Hyd | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro |
|---|---|---|
| 255.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 158.0 TH/s |
| 5,304 W | Power Consumption | 5,451 W |
| 20.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 34.5 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| 13.1 kg | Weight | 15.8 kg |
| 18,097 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 18,599 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 51/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S19 XP Hyd
Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro
Based on BTC price of $79,143 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer S19 XP Hyd comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption). Its biggest concrete edge: 40% better efficiency (20.8 vs 34.5 J/TH). That said, the Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer S19 XP Hyd and Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 61% more hashrate (255 vs 158 TH/s)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 3% better power draw (5,304 vs 5,451 W)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 40% better efficiency (20.8 vs 34.5 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro 20% better noise (50.0 vs 40.0 dB)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 17% better weight (13.1 vs 15.8 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro 3% more heat output (18,097 vs 18,599 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro 16% more home mining score (44.0 vs 51.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer S19 XP Hyd | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro |
|---|---|---|
| $6,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$3.44 | Daily net profit | -$7.33 |
| -$7,756 | Net after 1 year | -$2,675 |
| -$9,013 | Net after 2 years | -$5,349 |
| -$10,269 | Net after 3 years | -$8,024 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer T19 HydroScore: 51/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S19 XP Hyd20.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer S19 XP Hyd or the Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S19 XP Hyd is more profitable at $-3.44/day compared to $-7.33/day for the Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer S19 XP Hyd or the Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Antminer S19 XP Hyd at 50 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer S19 XP Hyd or the Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro?
The Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro scores 51/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 44/100 for the Antminer S19 XP Hyd). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer S19 XP Hyd and Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro?
The Antminer S19 XP Hyd runs at 20.8 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro runs at 34.5 J/TH — a difference of 13.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 40% better efficiency (20.8 vs 34.5 J/TH).