Antminer S19 XP Hyd vs Whatsminer M60
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S19 XP Hyd | Specification | Whatsminer M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 255.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 170.0 TH/s |
| 5,304 W | Power Consumption | 3,383 W |
| 20.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 19.9 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 13.1 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 18,097 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,543 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S19 XP Hyd
Whatsminer M60
Based on BTC price of $79,115 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer S19 XP Hyd, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 50% more hashrate (255 vs 170 TH/s). That said, the Whatsminer M60 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins efficiency and power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer S19 XP Hyd and Whatsminer M60 sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 50% more hashrate (255 vs 170 TH/s)
- Whatsminer M60 36% better power draw (5,304 vs 3,383 W)
- Whatsminer M60 4% better efficiency (20.8 vs 19.9 J/TH)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 33% better noise (50.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 3% better weight (13.1 vs 13.5 kg)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 57% more heat output (18,097 vs 11,543 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 22% more home mining score (44.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer S19 XP Hyd | Metric | Whatsminer M60 |
|---|---|---|
| $6,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,800 |
| -$3.45 | Daily net profit | -$1.93 |
| -$7,758 | Net after 1 year | -$5,504 |
| -$9,015 | Net after 2 years | -$6,209 |
| -$10,273 | Net after 3 years | -$6,913 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S19 XP HydScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M6019.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer S19 XP Hyd or Whatsminer M60 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M60 is more profitable at $-1.93/day compared to $-3.45/day for the Antminer S19 XP Hyd. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer S19 XP Hyd vs Whatsminer M60: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer S19 XP Hyd is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Whatsminer M60 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer S19 XP Hyd or the Whatsminer M60?
The Antminer S19 XP Hyd scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Whatsminer M60). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer S19 XP Hyd and Whatsminer M60 on J/TH?
The Antminer S19 XP Hyd runs at 20.8 J/TH while the Whatsminer M60 runs at 19.9 J/TH — a difference of 0.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 4% better efficiency (20.8 vs 19.9 J/TH).
