Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 |
|---|---|---|
| 288.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 37.0 TH/s |
| 4,896 W | Power Consumption | 2,380 W |
| 17.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 64.3 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 13.8 kg | Weight | 7,600.0 kg |
| 16,705 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,121 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th)
Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
Based on BTC price of $79,022 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th), which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 678% more hashrate (288.0 vs 37.0 TH/s). The Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 holds the edge in power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) 678% more hashrate (288.0 vs 37.0 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 51% better power draw (4,896 vs 2,380 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) 74% better efficiency (17.0 vs 64.3 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) 100% better weight (13.8 vs 7,600.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) 106% more heat output (16,705 vs 8,121 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) 69% more home mining score (44.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,498 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$1.28 | Daily net profit | -$4.37 |
| -$1,964 | Net after 1 year | -$1,594 |
| -$2,430 | Net after 2 years | -$3,188 |
| -$2,897 | Net after 3 years | -$4,781 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th)Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th)17.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) is more profitable at $-1.28/day compared to $-4.37/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) or the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner 1047?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (288Th) runs at 17.0 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 runs at 64.3 J/TH — a difference of 47.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 74% better efficiency (17.0 vs 64.3 J/TH).