Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) vs Whatsminer M53S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) | Specification | Whatsminer M53S |
|---|---|---|
| 310.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 260.0 TH/s |
| 5,270 W | Power Consumption | 6,760 W |
| 17.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 26.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 12.8 kg | Weight | 27.5 kg |
| 17,981 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 23,065 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th)
Whatsminer M53S
Based on BTC price of $79,091 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th), which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). The standout gap is 35% better efficiency (17.0 vs 26.0 J/TH) in the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th)'s favour. The Whatsminer M53S holds the edge in home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) and Whatsminer M53S sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) 19% more hashrate (310 vs 260 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) 22% better power draw (5,270 vs 6,760 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) 35% better efficiency (17.0 vs 26.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M53S 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) 53% better weight (12.8 vs 27.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M53S 28% more heat output (17,981 vs 23,065 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M53S 47% more home mining score (30.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) | Metric | Whatsminer M53S |
|---|---|---|
| $1,679 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $8,500 |
| -$1.37 | Daily net profit | -$6.76 |
| -$2,177 | Net after 1 year | -$10,968 |
| -$2,676 | Net after 2 years | -$13,435 |
| -$3,174 | Net after 3 years | -$15,903 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M53SScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th)17.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) vs Whatsminer M53S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) is more profitable at $-1.37/day compared to $-6.76/day for the Whatsminer M53S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) or Whatsminer M53S?
The Whatsminer M53S is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) or Whatsminer M53S?
The Whatsminer M53S scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) vs Whatsminer M53S: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) runs at 17.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M53S runs at 26.0 J/TH — a difference of 9.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 35% better efficiency (17.0 vs 26.0 J/TH).