Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)

Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)

Hashrate 13.5 TH/s Power 1,323 W Efficiency 98.0 J/TH
VS
Antminer S9i

Antminer S9i

Hashrate 14.0 TH/s Power 1,320 W Efficiency 94.3 J/TH

Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) vs Antminer S9i

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) Specification Antminer S9i
13.5 TH/s Hashrate 14.0 TH/s
1,323 W Power Consumption 1,320 W
98.0 J/TH Efficiency 94.3 J/TH
Noise Level 76 dB
4,200.0 kg Weight 4.2 kg
4,514 BTU/hr BTU Output 4,504 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 83/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)

Daily Revenue 0.00000621 BTC $0.49
Daily Electricity -$3.18
Daily Profit -$2.68
Monthly -$80.51
Yearly -$979.60

Antminer S9i

Daily Revenue 0.00000644 BTC $0.51
Daily Electricity -$3.17
Daily Profit -$2.66
Monthly -$79.75
Yearly -$970.33

Based on BTC price of $79,095 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Antminer S9i wins on 5 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 4% better efficiency (98.0 vs 94.3 J/TH) in the Antminer S9i's favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Antminer S9i — wins on 5 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) and Antminer S9i diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Antminer S9i 4% more hashrate (13.5 vs 14.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer S9i 4% better efficiency (98.0 vs 94.3 J/TH)
  • Antminer S9i 100% better weight (4,200.0 vs 4.2 kg)
  • Antminer S9i 168% more home mining score (31.0 vs 83.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) Metric Antminer S9i
$65 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$2.68 Daily net profit -$2.66
-$1,045 Net after 1 year -$970
-$2,024 Net after 2 years -$1,941
-$3,004 Net after 3 years -$2,911
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer S9i

Score: 83/100. 76 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer S9i

94.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) vs Antminer S9i: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S9i is more profitable at $-2.66/day compared to $-2.68/day for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) or the Antminer S9i better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Antminer S9i is quieter at 76 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) vs Antminer S9i: which fits a residential setup better?

The Antminer S9i scores 83/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) vs Antminer S9i: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) runs at 98.0 J/TH while the Antminer S9i runs at 94.3 J/TH — a difference of 3.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 4% better efficiency (98.0 vs 94.3 J/TH).