Antminer S9 vs NerdOctaxe Gamma
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S9 | Specification | NerdOctaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 8.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 200 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 25.0 J/TH |
| 76 dB | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 4.2 kg | Weight | 0.8 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 682 BTU/hr |
| 83/100 | Home Mining Score | 61/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S9
NerdOctaxe Gamma
Based on BTC price of $79,143 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the NerdOctaxe Gamma, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 85% better power draw (1,350 vs 200 W). That said, the Antminer S9 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer S9 and NerdOctaxe Gamma actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer S9 75% more hashrate (14.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 85% better power draw (1,350 vs 200 W)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 74% better efficiency (96.4 vs 25.0 J/TH)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 41% better noise (76.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 81% better weight (4.2 vs 0.8 kg)
- Antminer S9 575% more heat output (4,606 vs 682 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S9 36% more home mining score (83.0 vs 61.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer S9 | Metric | NerdOctaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $599 |
| -$2.73 | Daily net profit | -$0.19 |
| -$996 | Net after 1 year | -$668 |
| -$1,993 | Net after 2 years | -$737 |
| -$2,989 | Net after 3 years | -$806 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S9Score: 83/100. 76 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
NerdOctaxe Gamma25.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer S9 vs NerdOctaxe Gamma: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdOctaxe Gamma is more profitable at $-0.19/day compared to $-2.73/day for the Antminer S9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer S9 or the NerdOctaxe Gamma better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Antminer S9 at 76 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer S9 vs NerdOctaxe Gamma: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer S9 scores 83/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 61/100 for the NerdOctaxe Gamma). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer S9 vs NerdOctaxe Gamma: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer S9 runs at 96.4 J/TH while the NerdOctaxe Gamma runs at 25.0 J/TH — a difference of 71.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 74% better efficiency (96.4 vs 25.0 J/TH).