Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) | Specification | Canaan Avalon Nano 3S |
|---|---|---|
| 23.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.0 TH/s |
| 1,541 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| 67.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 23.3 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 30 dB |
| 6,600.0 kg | Weight | 0.9 kg |
| 5,258 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 478 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)
Canaan Avalon Nano 3S
Based on BTC price of $79,143 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 91% better power draw (1,541 vs 140 W) in the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S's favour. The Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) holds the edge in hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) and Canaan Avalon Nano 3S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) 283% more hashrate (23.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 91% better power draw (1,541 vs 140 W)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 65% better efficiency (67.0 vs 23.3 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 100% better weight (6,600.0 vs 0.9 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) 1001% more heat output (5,258 vs 478 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 132% more home mining score (28.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) | Metric | Canaan Avalon Nano 3S |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $145 |
| -$2.86 | Daily net profit | -$0.12 |
| -$1,044 | Net after 1 year | -$188 |
| -$2,088 | Net after 2 years | -$231 |
| -$3,133 | Net after 3 years | -$274 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon Nano 3SScore: 65/100. 30 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon Nano 3S23.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S is more profitable at $-0.12/day compared to $-2.86/day for the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) or the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) or Canaan Avalon Nano 3S?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3S: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) runs at 67.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S runs at 23.3 J/TH — a difference of 43.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 65% better efficiency (67.0 vs 23.3 J/TH).