Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 |
|---|---|---|
| 10.5 TH/s | Hashrate | 150.0 TH/s |
| 1,432 W | Power Consumption | 3,230 W |
| 136.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 21.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | 13.0 kg |
| 4,886 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,021 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466
Based on BTC price of $79,097 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 1329% more hashrate (10.5 vs 150.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 1329% more hashrate (10.5 vs 150.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) 56% better power draw (1,432 vs 3,230 W)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 84% better efficiency (136.4 vs 21.5 J/TH)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 100% better weight (4,200.0 vs 13.0 kg)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 126% more heat output (4,886 vs 11,021 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) 41% more home mining score (31.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 |
|---|---|---|
| $955 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $937 |
| -$3.05 | Daily net profit | -$2.29 |
| -$2,070 | Net after 1 year | -$1,774 |
| -$3,185 | Net after 2 years | -$2,610 |
| -$4,300 | Net after 3 years | -$3,447 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A146621.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) or the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 is more profitable at $-2.29/day compared to $-3.05/day for the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) or the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466?
The Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) runs at 136.4 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 runs at 21.5 J/TH — a difference of 114.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 84% better efficiency (136.4 vs 21.5 J/TH).