Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh)

Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh)

Hashrate 220.0 KH/s Power 465 W Efficiency 2,113,636,363.6 J/TH
VS
Baikal BK-N240

Baikal BK-N240

Hashrate 480.0 KH/s Power 650 W Efficiency 1,354,166,666.7 J/TH

Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) vs Baikal BK-N240

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) Specification Baikal BK-N240
220.0 KH/s Hashrate 480.0 KH/s
465 W Power Consumption 650 W
2,113,636,363.6 J/TH Efficiency 1,354,166,666.7 J/TH
Noise Level
5,500.0 kg Weight 6,500.0 kg
1,587 BTU/hr BTU Output 2,218 BTU/hr
34/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
Cryptonight Algorithm Cryptonight
Bitmain Manufacturer Baikal

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.12
Daily Profit -$1.12
Monthly -$33.48
Yearly -$407.34

Baikal BK-N240

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.56
Daily Profit -$1.56
Monthly -$46.80
Yearly -$569.40

Based on BTC price of $78,209 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Both the Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) and Baikal BK-N240 are closely matched across our scoring factors, with neither holding a decisive advantage. Your choice should depend on your specific priorities — review the specs and profitability analysis above.

Spec Deltas

The Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) and Baikal BK-N240 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Baikal BK-N240 118% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) 28% better power draw (465 vs 650 W)
  • Baikal BK-N240 36% better efficiency (2,113,636,364 vs 1,354,166,667 J/TH)
  • Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) 15% better weight (5,500 vs 6,500 kg)
  • Baikal BK-N240 40% more heat output (1,587 vs 2,218 BTU/hr)
  • Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) 13% more home mining score (34.0 vs 30.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh)

Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Baikal BK-N240

1,354,166,666.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) or the Baikal BK-N240?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) is more profitable at $-1.12/day compared to $-1.56/day for the Baikal BK-N240. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) or Baikal BK-N240?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) vs Baikal BK-N240: which fits a residential setup better?

The Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Baikal BK-N240). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) and Baikal BK-N240 on J/TH?

The Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) runs at 2,113,636,363.6 J/TH while the Baikal BK-N240 runs at 1,354,166,666.7 J/TH — a difference of 759,469,697.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 36% better efficiency (2,113,636,364 vs 1,354,166,667 J/TH).