Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Ebang Ebit E12+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Auradine Teraflux AI3680 | Specification | Ebang Ebit E12+ |
|---|---|---|
| 375.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 50.0 TH/s |
| 5,625 W | Power Consumption | 2,500 W |
| 15.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 50.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| — | Weight | 10,500.0 kg |
| 19,193 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,530 BTU/hr |
| — | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Auradine | Manufacturer | Ebang |
Profitability Comparison
Auradine Teraflux AI3680
Ebang Ebit E12+
Based on BTC price of $78,200 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). The standout gap is 650% more hashrate (375.0 vs 50.0 TH/s) in the Auradine Teraflux AI3680's favour. That said, the Ebang Ebit E12+ isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 and Ebang Ebit E12+ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 650% more hashrate (375.0 vs 50.0 TH/s)
- Ebang Ebit E12+ 56% better power draw (5,625 vs 2,500 W)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 70% better efficiency (15.0 vs 50.0 J/TH)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 125% more heat output (19,193 vs 8,530 BTU/hr)
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Ebang Ebit E12+Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Auradine Teraflux AI368015.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or the Ebang Ebit E12+?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is more profitable at $-0.01/day compared to $-4.20/day for the Ebang Ebit E12+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Ebang Ebit E12+?
The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Ebang Ebit E12+ at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Ebang Ebit E12+: which fits a residential setup better?
The Ebang Ebit E12+ scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Ebang Ebit E12+: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E12+ runs at 50.0 J/TH — a difference of 35.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 70% better efficiency (15.0 vs 50.0 J/TH).
Compare Auradine Teraflux AI3680 with...
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Auradine Teraflux AT2880
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Aisen A1 Pro
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer S17