Canaan Avalon A15-194T vs Whatsminer M60
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon A15-194T | Specification | Whatsminer M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 194.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 170.0 TH/s |
| 3,647 W | Power Consumption | 3,383 W |
| 18.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 19.9 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 12.8 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 12,444 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,543 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon A15-194T
Whatsminer M60
Based on BTC price of $79,032 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Canaan Avalon A15-194T, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 14% more hashrate (194 vs 170 TH/s). The Whatsminer M60 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Canaan Avalon A15-194T and Whatsminer M60 sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan Avalon A15-194T 14% more hashrate (194 vs 170 TH/s)
- Whatsminer M60 7% better power draw (3,647 vs 3,383 W)
- Canaan Avalon A15-194T 6% better efficiency (18.8 vs 19.9 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon A15-194T 5% better weight (12.8 vs 13.5 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A15-194T 8% more heat output (12,444 vs 11,543 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M60 20% more home mining score (30.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Canaan Avalon A15-194T | Metric | Whatsminer M60 |
|---|---|---|
| $2,749 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,800 |
| -$1.70 | Daily net profit | -$1.94 |
| -$3,368 | Net after 1 year | -$5,507 |
| -$3,988 | Net after 2 years | -$6,214 |
| -$4,607 | Net after 3 years | -$6,920 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M60Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A15-194T18.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Canaan Avalon A15-194T vs Whatsminer M60: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A15-194T is more profitable at $-1.70/day compared to $-1.94/day for the Whatsminer M60. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Canaan Avalon A15-194T or Whatsminer M60?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Canaan Avalon A15-194T vs Whatsminer M60: which fits a residential setup better?
The Whatsminer M60 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Canaan Avalon A15-194T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Canaan Avalon A15-194T vs Whatsminer M60: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Canaan Avalon A15-194T runs at 18.8 J/TH while the Whatsminer M60 runs at 19.9 J/TH — a difference of 1.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 6% better efficiency (18.8 vs 19.9 J/TH).