Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Canaan AvalonMiner 1066

Canaan AvalonMiner 1066

Hashrate 50.0 TH/s Power 3,250 W Efficiency 65.0 J/TH
VS
Ebang Ebit E9

Ebang Ebit E9

Hashrate 6.3 TH/s Power 1,077 W Efficiency 171.0 J/TH

Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 vs Ebang Ebit E9

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 Specification Ebang Ebit E9
50.0 TH/s Hashrate 6.3 TH/s
3,250 W Power Consumption 1,077 W
65.0 J/TH Efficiency 171.0 J/TH
Noise Level
11,400.0 kg Weight
11,089 BTU/hr BTU Output 3,675 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Ebang

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Canaan AvalonMiner 1066

Daily Revenue 0.00002301 BTC $1.80
Daily Electricity -$7.80
Daily Profit -$6.00
Monthly -$179.92
Yearly -$2,189.02

Ebang Ebit E9

Daily Revenue 0.00000290 BTC $0.23
Daily Electricity -$2.58
Daily Profit -$2.36
Monthly -$70.73
Yearly -$860.55

Based on BTC price of $78,346 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 694% more hashrate (50.0 vs 6.3 TH/s) in the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066's favour. The Ebang Ebit E9 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 and Ebang Ebit E9 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 694% more hashrate (50.0 vs 6.3 TH/s)
  • Ebang Ebit E9 67% better power draw (3,250 vs 1,077 W)
  • Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 62% better efficiency (65.0 vs 171.0 J/TH)
  • Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 202% more heat output (11,089 vs 3,675 BTU/hr)
  • Ebang Ebit E9 41% more home mining score (22.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 Metric Ebang Ebit E9
$1,255 Upfront cost (MSRP) $370
-$6.00 Daily net profit -$2.36
-$3,444 Net after 1 year -$1,231
-$5,633 Net after 2 years -$2,091
-$7,822 Net after 3 years -$2,952
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Ebang Ebit E9

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Canaan AvalonMiner 1066

65.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 or Ebang Ebit E9 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Ebang Ebit E9 is more profitable at $-2.36/day compared to $-6.00/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 or Ebang Ebit E9?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 or the Ebang Ebit E9?

The Ebang Ebit E9 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 vs Ebang Ebit E9: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 runs at 65.0 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E9 runs at 171.0 J/TH — a difference of 106.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 62% better efficiency (65.0 vs 171.0 J/TH).