Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iPollo B1L

iPollo B1L

Hashrate 58.0 TH/s Power 3,000 W Efficiency 51.7 J/TH
VS
Whatsminer M30S+

Whatsminer M30S+

Hashrate 100.0 TH/s Power 3,400 W Efficiency 34.0 J/TH

iPollo B1L vs Whatsminer M30S+

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo B1L Specification Whatsminer M30S+
58.0 TH/s Hashrate 100.0 TH/s
3,000 W Power Consumption 3,400 W
51.7 J/TH Efficiency 34.0 J/TH
Noise Level 75 dB
12,700.0 kg Weight 11.5 kg
10,236 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,601 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
iPollo Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo B1L

Daily Revenue 0.00002669 BTC $2.11
Daily Electricity -$7.20
Daily Profit -$5.09
Monthly -$152.67
Yearly -$1,857.50

Whatsminer M30S+

Daily Revenue 0.00004602 BTC $3.64
Daily Electricity -$8.16
Daily Profit -$4.52
Monthly -$135.61
Yearly -$1,649.95

Based on BTC price of $79,090 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Whatsminer M30S+ edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 72% more hashrate (58.0 vs 100.0 TH/s). The iPollo B1L holds the edge in power consumption and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Whatsminer M30S+ — wins on 4 of 6 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo B1L and Whatsminer M30S+ sit on each measurable spec:

  • Whatsminer M30S+ 72% more hashrate (58.0 vs 100.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo B1L 12% better power draw (3,000 vs 3,400 W)
  • Whatsminer M30S+ 34% better efficiency (51.7 vs 34.0 J/TH)
  • Whatsminer M30S+ 100% better weight (12,700.0 vs 11.5 kg)
  • Whatsminer M30S+ 13% more heat output (10,236 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
  • Whatsminer M30S+ 64% more home mining score (22.0 vs 36.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

iPollo B1L Metric Whatsminer M30S+
$430 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,800
-$5.09 Daily net profit -$4.52
-$2,287 Net after 1 year -$3,450
-$4,145 Net after 2 years -$5,100
-$6,002 Net after 3 years -$6,750
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Whatsminer M30S+

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Whatsminer M30S+

34.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the iPollo B1L or the Whatsminer M30S+?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M30S+ is more profitable at $-4.52/day compared to $-5.09/day for the iPollo B1L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the iPollo B1L or Whatsminer M30S+?

The Whatsminer M30S+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iPollo B1L at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

iPollo B1L vs Whatsminer M30S+: which fits a residential setup better?

The Whatsminer M30S+ scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo B1L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between iPollo B1L and Whatsminer M30S+?

The iPollo B1L runs at 51.7 J/TH while the Whatsminer M30S+ runs at 34.0 J/TH — a difference of 17.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 34% better efficiency (51.7 vs 34.0 J/TH).