Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

1325 Rue Bergar, Laval, QC support@d-central.tech 1-855-753-9997 Mon-Fri: 8:30 - 18:00
Bitaxe GT

Bitaxe GT

Hashrate 5.0 TH/s Power 75 W Efficiency 15.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T3+ 57T

Innosilicon T3+ 57T

Hashrate 57.0 TH/s Power 3,300 W Efficiency 57.9 J/TH

Bitaxe GT vs Innosilicon T3+ 57T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitaxe GT Specification Innosilicon T3+ 57T
5.0 TH/s Hashrate 57.0 TH/s
75 W Power Consumption 3,300 W
15.0 J/TH Efficiency 57.9 J/TH
42 dB Noise Level —
0.4 kg Weight 10,380.0 kg
256 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,260 BTU/hr
64/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
— Release Year —
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
D-Central Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitaxe GT

Daily Revenue 0.00000230 BTC $0.18
Daily Electricity -$0.18
Daily Profit $0.00
Monthly $0.06
Yearly $0.77

Innosilicon T3+ 57T

Daily Revenue 0.00002623 BTC $2.08
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$5.84
Monthly -$175.32
Yearly -$2,133.08

Based on BTC price of $79,143 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitaxe GT edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 98% better power draw (75.0 vs 3,300.0 W). That said, the Innosilicon T3+ 57T isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Bitaxe GT — wins on 4 of 6 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitaxe GT and Innosilicon T3+ 57T sit on each measurable spec:

  • Innosilicon T3+ 57T 1040% more hashrate (5.0 vs 57.0 TH/s)
  • Bitaxe GT 98% better power draw (75.0 vs 3,300.0 W)
  • Bitaxe GT 74% better efficiency (15.0 vs 57.9 J/TH)
  • Bitaxe GT 100% better weight (0.4 vs 10,380.0 kg)
  • Innosilicon T3+ 57T 4300% more heat output (256 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
  • Bitaxe GT 191% more home mining score (64.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Bitaxe GT Metric Innosilicon T3+ 57T
$499 Upfront cost (MSRP) $550
$0.00 Daily net profit -$5.84
-$498 Net after 1 year -$2,683
-$497 Net after 2 years -$4,816
-$497 Net after 3 years -$6,949
Takes ~650.6 years to pay back at current rates Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Bitaxe GT

$5.85/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Bitaxe GT

Score: 64/100. 42 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitaxe GT

15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Bitaxe GT vs Innosilicon T3+ 57T: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe GT is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-5.84/day for the Innosilicon T3+ 57T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Bitaxe GT vs Innosilicon T3+ 57T: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Bitaxe GT is quieter at 42 dB compared to the Innosilicon T3+ 57T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Bitaxe GT or Innosilicon T3+ 57T?

The Bitaxe GT scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T3+ 57T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Bitaxe GT and Innosilicon T3+ 57T on J/TH?

The Bitaxe GT runs at 15.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3+ 57T runs at 57.9 J/TH — a difference of 42.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 74% better efficiency (15.0 vs 57.9 J/TH).

Compare Bitaxe GT with...

Compare Innosilicon T3+ 57T with...

Shop Miners Browse our full catalog of ASIC miners, Bitaxe, and accessories. ASIC Repair 2,500+ miners repaired. Expert diagnostics and board-level repair. Miner Database Compare 500+ miners with live profitability data.