Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bitaxe Supra

Bitaxe Supra

Hashrate 600.0 GH/s Power 15 W Efficiency 25.0 J/TH
VS
Ebang Ebit E12+

Ebang Ebit E12+

Hashrate 50.0 TH/s Power 2,500 W Efficiency 50.0 J/TH

Bitaxe Supra vs Ebang Ebit E12+

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitaxe Supra Specification Ebang Ebit E12+
600.0 GH/s Hashrate 50.0 TH/s
15 W Power Consumption 2,500 W
25.0 J/TH Efficiency 50.0 J/TH
35 dB Noise Level
0.3 kg Weight 10,500.0 kg
51 BTU/hr BTU Output 8,530 BTU/hr
70/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
D-Central Manufacturer Ebang

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitaxe Supra

Daily Revenue 0.00000028 BTC $0.02
Daily Electricity -$0.04
Daily Profit -$0.01
Monthly -$0.43
Yearly -$5.26

Ebang Ebit E12+

Daily Revenue 0.00002301 BTC $1.80
Daily Electricity -$6.00
Daily Profit -$4.20
Monthly -$126.04
Yearly -$1,533.43

Based on BTC price of $78,178 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Bitaxe Supra comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 99% better power draw (15.0 vs 2,500.0 W). The Ebang Ebit E12+ holds the edge in hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Bitaxe Supra — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Bitaxe Supra and Ebang Ebit E12+ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Ebang Ebit E12+ 8233% more hashrate (0.6 vs 50.0 TH/s)
  • Bitaxe Supra 99% better power draw (15.0 vs 2,500.0 W)
  • Bitaxe Supra 50% better efficiency (25.0 vs 50.0 J/TH)
  • Bitaxe Supra 100% better weight (0.3 vs 10,500.0 kg)
  • Ebang Ebit E12+ 16560% more heat output (51.2 vs 8,530.0 BTU/hr)
  • Bitaxe Supra 169% more home mining score (70.0 vs 26.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Bitaxe Supra Metric Ebang Ebit E12+
$89 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$0.01 Daily net profit -$4.20
-$94 Net after 1 year -$1,533
-$100 Net after 2 years -$3,067
-$105 Net after 3 years -$4,600
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitaxe Supra

Score: 70/100. 35 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitaxe Supra

25.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Bitaxe Supra or Ebang Ebit E12+ more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Supra is more profitable at $-0.01/day compared to $-4.20/day for the Ebang Ebit E12+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Bitaxe Supra or Ebang Ebit E12+?

The Bitaxe Supra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Ebang Ebit E12+ at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Bitaxe Supra or the Ebang Ebit E12+?

The Bitaxe Supra scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Ebang Ebit E12+). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Bitaxe Supra and Ebang Ebit E12+?

The Bitaxe Supra runs at 25.0 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E12+ runs at 50.0 J/TH — a difference of 25.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 50% better efficiency (25.0 vs 50.0 J/TH).