Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Baikal BK-B

Baikal BK-B

Hashrate 160.0 GH/s Power 410 W Efficiency 2,562.5 J/TH
VS
iBeLink DSM6T

iBeLink DSM6T

Hashrate 6.0 TH/s Power 2,100 W Efficiency 350.0 J/TH

Baikal BK-B vs iBeLink DSM6T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Baikal BK-B Specification iBeLink DSM6T
160.0 GH/s Hashrate 6.0 TH/s
410 W Power Consumption 2,100 W
2,562.5 J/TH Efficiency 350.0 J/TH
Noise Level
3,800.0 kg Weight 17,600.0 kg
1,399 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,165 BTU/hr
34/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
Blake256r14 Algorithm Blake256r14
Baikal Manufacturer iBeLink

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Baikal BK-B

Daily Revenue 0.00000007 BTC $0.01
Daily Electricity -$0.98
Daily Profit -$0.98
Monthly -$29.35
Yearly -$357.06

iBeLink DSM6T

Daily Revenue 0.00000276 BTC $0.22
Daily Electricity -$5.04
Daily Profit -$4.82
Monthly -$144.73
Yearly -$1,760.84

Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the iBeLink DSM6T comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 3650% more hashrate (0.2 vs 6.0 TH/s). That said, the Baikal BK-B isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: iBeLink DSM6T — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Baikal BK-B and iBeLink DSM6T actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • iBeLink DSM6T 3650% more hashrate (0.2 vs 6.0 TH/s)
  • Baikal BK-B 80% better power draw (410 vs 2,100 W)
  • iBeLink DSM6T 86% better efficiency (2,563 vs 350 J/TH)
  • Baikal BK-B 78% better weight (3,800 vs 17,600 kg)
  • iBeLink DSM6T 412% more heat output (1,399 vs 7,165 BTU/hr)
  • Baikal BK-B 31% more home mining score (34.0 vs 26.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Baikal BK-B

Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iBeLink DSM6T

350.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Baikal BK-B or iBeLink DSM6T more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-B is more profitable at $-0.98/day compared to $-4.82/day for the iBeLink DSM6T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Baikal BK-B or the iBeLink DSM6T better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Baikal BK-B vs iBeLink DSM6T: which fits a residential setup better?

The Baikal BK-B scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the iBeLink DSM6T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Baikal BK-B and iBeLink DSM6T on J/TH?

The Baikal BK-B runs at 2,562.5 J/TH while the iBeLink DSM6T runs at 350.0 J/TH — a difference of 2,212.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficiency (2,563 vs 350 J/TH).