Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Baikal BK-X

Baikal BK-X

Hashrate 10.0 GH/s Power 630 W Efficiency 63,000.0 J/TH
VS
iBeLink DM56G

iBeLink DM56G

Hashrate 56.0 GH/s Power 2,100 W Efficiency 37,500.0 J/TH

Baikal BK-X vs iBeLink DM56G

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Baikal BK-X Specification iBeLink DM56G
10.0 GH/s Hashrate 56.0 GH/s
630 W Power Consumption 2,100 W
63,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 37,500.0 J/TH
Noise Level
3,700.0 kg Weight 16,500.0 kg
2,150 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,165 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithm X11
Baikal Manufacturer iBeLink

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Baikal BK-X

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.51
Daily Profit -$1.51
Monthly -$45.35
Yearly -$551.75

iBeLink DM56G

Daily Revenue 0.00000003 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$5.04
Daily Profit -$5.04
Monthly -$151.14
Yearly -$1,838.86

Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the iBeLink DM56G, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 460% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.1 TH/s). The Baikal BK-X claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: iBeLink DM56G — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The Baikal BK-X and iBeLink DM56G diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • iBeLink DM56G 460% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
  • Baikal BK-X 70% better power draw (630 vs 2,100 W)
  • iBeLink DM56G 40% better efficiency (63,000 vs 37,500 J/TH)
  • Baikal BK-X 78% better weight (3,700 vs 16,500 kg)
  • iBeLink DM56G 233% more heat output (2,150 vs 7,165 BTU/hr)
  • Baikal BK-X 15% more home mining score (30.0 vs 26.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Baikal BK-X

Score: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iBeLink DM56G

37,500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Baikal BK-X vs iBeLink DM56G: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-X is more profitable at $-1.51/day compared to $-5.04/day for the iBeLink DM56G. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Baikal BK-X vs iBeLink DM56G: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Baikal BK-X or the iBeLink DM56G?

The Baikal BK-X scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the iBeLink DM56G). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Baikal BK-X vs iBeLink DM56G: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Baikal BK-X runs at 63,000.0 J/TH while the iBeLink DM56G runs at 37,500.0 J/TH — a difference of 25,500.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 40% better efficiency (63,000 vs 37,500 J/TH).