Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iBeLink BM-N1

iBeLink BM-N1

Hashrate 6.6 TH/s Power 2,400 W Efficiency 363.6 J/TH
VS
iBeLink DM56G

iBeLink DM56G

Hashrate 56.0 GH/s Power 2,100 W Efficiency 37,500.0 J/TH

iBeLink BM-N1 vs iBeLink DM56G

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iBeLink BM-N1 Specification iBeLink DM56G
6.6 TH/s Hashrate 56.0 GH/s
2,400 W Power Consumption 2,100 W
363.6 J/TH Efficiency 37,500.0 J/TH
Noise Level
9,900.0 kg Weight 16,500.0 kg
8,189 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,165 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
Eaglesong Algorithm X11
iBeLink Manufacturer iBeLink

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iBeLink BM-N1

Daily Revenue 0.00000304 BTC $0.24
Daily Electricity -$5.76
Daily Profit -$5.52
Monthly -$165.68
Yearly -$2,015.76

iBeLink DM56G

Daily Revenue 0.00000003 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$5.04
Daily Profit -$5.04
Monthly -$151.14
Yearly -$1,838.86

Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the iBeLink BM-N1, which leads on 2 of 3 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 11686% more hashrate (6.6 vs 0.1 TH/s). The iBeLink DM56G holds the edge in power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: iBeLink BM-N1 — wins on 2 of 3 factors

Spec Deltas

The iBeLink BM-N1 and iBeLink DM56G diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • iBeLink BM-N1 11686% more hashrate (6.6 vs 0.1 TH/s)
  • iBeLink DM56G 13% better power draw (2,400 vs 2,100 W)
  • iBeLink BM-N1 99% better efficiency (364 vs 37,500 J/TH)
  • iBeLink BM-N1 40% better weight (9,900 vs 16,500 kg)
  • iBeLink BM-N1 14% more heat output (8,189 vs 7,165 BTU/hr)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

iBeLink BM-N1

363.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

iBeLink BM-N1 vs iBeLink DM56G: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink DM56G is more profitable at $-5.04/day compared to $-5.52/day for the iBeLink BM-N1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-N1 or iBeLink DM56G?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-N1 or iBeLink DM56G?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the iBeLink BM-N1 and iBeLink DM56G on J/TH?

The iBeLink BM-N1 runs at 363.6 J/TH while the iBeLink DM56G runs at 37,500.0 J/TH — a difference of 37,136.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficiency (364 vs 37,500 J/TH).