iBeLink BM-KS Max vs IceRiver KS3L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Specification | IceRiver KS3L |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 5.0 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Power Consumption | 3,200 W |
| 309.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 640.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 12.2 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-KS Max
IceRiver KS3L
Based on BTC price of $73,958 and current network difficulty as of Mar 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on specs, the iBeLink BM-KS Max offers 52% better efficiency at 309.1 J/TH compared to the IceRiver KS3L at 640.0 J/TH. This directly impacts daily operating costs and long-term profitability.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-KS Max309.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-KS Max or IceRiver KS3L more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS3L is more profitable at $-7.52/day compared to $-7.81/day for the iBeLink BM-KS Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-KS Max or IceRiver KS3L?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-KS Max or IceRiver KS3L?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-KS Max and IceRiver KS3L?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max runs at 309.1 J/TH while the IceRiver KS3L runs at 640.0 J/TH — a difference of 330.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.