Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Goldshell CK5

Goldshell CK5

Hashrate 12.0 TH/s Power 2,400 W Efficiency 200.0 J/TH
VS
Todek Toddminer C1 PRO

Todek Toddminer C1 PRO

Hashrate 3.0 TH/s Power 2,700 W Efficiency 900.0 J/TH

Goldshell CK5 vs Todek Toddminer C1 PRO

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell CK5 Specification Todek Toddminer C1 PRO
12.0 TH/s Hashrate 3.0 TH/s
2,400 W Power Consumption 2,700 W
200.0 J/TH Efficiency 900.0 J/TH
Noise Level
8,500.0 kg Weight 12,000.0 kg
8,189 BTU/hr BTU Output 9,212 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
Eaglesong Algorithm Eaglesong
Goldshell Manufacturer Todek

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell CK5

Daily Revenue 0.00000552 BTC $0.43
Daily Electricity -$5.76
Daily Profit -$5.33
Monthly -$159.84
Yearly -$1,944.67

Todek Toddminer C1 PRO

Daily Revenue 0.00000138 BTC $0.11
Daily Electricity -$6.48
Daily Profit -$6.37
Monthly -$191.16
Yearly -$2,325.77

Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell CK5 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 4 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score). Where it pulls away hardest is 78% better efficiency (200 vs 900 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Goldshell CK5 — wins on 4 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Goldshell CK5 and Todek Toddminer C1 PRO actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Goldshell CK5 300% more hashrate (12.0 vs 3.0 TH/s)
  • Goldshell CK5 11% better power draw (2,400 vs 2,700 W)
  • Goldshell CK5 78% better efficiency (200 vs 900 J/TH)
  • Goldshell CK5 29% better weight (8,500 vs 12,000 kg)
  • Todek Toddminer C1 PRO 13% more heat output (8,189 vs 9,212 BTU/hr)
  • Goldshell CK5 18% more home mining score (26.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Goldshell CK5 Metric Todek Toddminer C1 PRO
$998 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$5.33 Daily net profit -$6.37
-$2,943 Net after 1 year -$2,326
-$4,887 Net after 2 years -$4,652
-$6,832 Net after 3 years -$6,977
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell CK5

Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell CK5

200.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Goldshell CK5 vs Todek Toddminer C1 PRO: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK5 is more profitable at $-5.33/day compared to $-6.37/day for the Todek Toddminer C1 PRO. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Goldshell CK5 or Todek Toddminer C1 PRO?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Goldshell CK5 vs Todek Toddminer C1 PRO: which fits a residential setup better?

The Goldshell CK5 scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Todek Toddminer C1 PRO). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Goldshell CK5 vs Todek Toddminer C1 PRO: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Goldshell CK5 runs at 200.0 J/TH while the Todek Toddminer C1 PRO runs at 900.0 J/TH — a difference of 700.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 78% better efficiency (200 vs 900 J/TH).