Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Elphapex DG1S

Elphapex DG1S

Hashrate 10.0 GH/s Power 3,100 W Efficiency 310,000.0 J/TH
VS
BW L21

BW L21

Hashrate 550.0 MH/s Power 950 W Efficiency 1,727,272.7 J/TH

Elphapex DG1S vs BW L21

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Elphapex DG1S Specification BW L21
10.0 GH/s Hashrate 550.0 MH/s
3,100 W Power Consumption 950 W
310,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 1,727,272.7 J/TH
50 dB Noise Level
25.0 kg Weight 5,750.0 kg
10,577 BTU/hr BTU Output 3,241 BTU/hr
50/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
Scrypt Algorithm Scrypt
Elphapex Manufacturer BW

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Elphapex DG1S

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$7.44
Daily Profit -$7.44
Monthly -$223.19
Yearly -$2,715.47

BW L21

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.28
Daily Profit -$2.28
Monthly -$68.40
Yearly -$832.19

Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Elphapex DG1S, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 1718% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the BW L21 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Elphapex DG1S — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Elphapex DG1S and BW L21 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Elphapex DG1S 1718% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • BW L21 69% better power draw (3,100 vs 950 W)
  • Elphapex DG1S 82% better efficiency (310,000 vs 1,727,273 J/TH)
  • Elphapex DG1S 100% better weight (25.0 vs 5,750.0 kg)
  • Elphapex DG1S 226% more heat output (10,577 vs 3,241 BTU/hr)
  • Elphapex DG1S 61% more home mining score (50.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Elphapex DG1S Metric BW L21
$2,800 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$7.44 Daily net profit -$2.28
-$5,515 Net after 1 year -$832
-$8,231 Net after 2 years -$1,664
-$10,946 Net after 3 years -$2,497
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Elphapex DG1S

Score: 50/100. 50 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Elphapex DG1S

310,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Elphapex DG1S vs BW L21: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the BW L21 is more profitable at $-2.28/day compared to $-7.44/day for the Elphapex DG1S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Elphapex DG1S vs BW L21: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Elphapex DG1S is quieter at 50 dB compared to the BW L21 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Elphapex DG1S or the BW L21?

The Elphapex DG1S scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the BW L21). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Elphapex DG1S and BW L21?

The Elphapex DG1S runs at 310,000.0 J/TH while the BW L21 runs at 1,727,272.7 J/TH — a difference of 1,417,272.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 82% better efficiency (310,000 vs 1,727,273 J/TH).