Elphapex DG2+ vs Goldshell E-DG1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Elphapex DG2+ | Specification | Goldshell E-DG1M |
|---|---|---|
| 20.5 GH/s | Hashrate | 3.4 GH/s |
| 3,900 W | Power Consumption | 1,800 W |
| 190,243.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 529,411.8 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 16.5 kg | Weight | 16.0 kg |
| 13,307 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,142 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Elphapex | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Elphapex DG2+
Goldshell E-DG1M
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
The Elphapex DG2+ and Goldshell E-DG1M finish in a near dead heat in our weighted scoring. There is no wrong answer here — let your electricity rate, noise tolerance and budget break the tie using the breakdowns above.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Elphapex DG2+ and Goldshell E-DG1M sit on each measurable spec:
- Elphapex DG2+ 503% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 54% better power draw (3,900 vs 1,800 W)
- Elphapex DG2+ 64% better efficiency (190,244 vs 529,412 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 40% better noise (75.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 3% better weight (16.5 vs 16.0 kg)
- Elphapex DG2+ 117% more heat output (13,307 vs 6,142 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 87% more home mining score (30.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Elphapex DG2+ | Metric | Goldshell E-DG1M |
|---|---|---|
| $8,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $799 |
| -$9.36 | Daily net profit | -$4.32 |
| -$11,416 | Net after 1 year | -$2,376 |
| -$14,832 | Net after 2 years | -$3,953 |
| -$18,248 | Net after 3 years | -$5,529 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell E-DG1MScore: 56/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Elphapex DG2+190,243.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Elphapex DG2+ or Goldshell E-DG1M more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell E-DG1M is more profitable at $-4.32/day compared to $-9.36/day for the Elphapex DG2+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Elphapex DG2+ or Goldshell E-DG1M?
The Goldshell E-DG1M is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Elphapex DG2+ at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Elphapex DG2+ or the Goldshell E-DG1M?
The Goldshell E-DG1M scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Elphapex DG2+). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Elphapex DG2+ and Goldshell E-DG1M on J/TH?
The Elphapex DG2+ runs at 190,243.9 J/TH while the Goldshell E-DG1M runs at 529,411.8 J/TH — a difference of 339,167.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 64% better efficiency (190,244 vs 529,412 J/TH).