Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell E-DG1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell E-DG1M |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 3.4 GH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 1,800 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 529,411.8 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 16.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,142 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell E-DG1M
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell E-DG1M edges it: 6 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 94% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 529,412 J/TH) in the Goldshell E-DG1M's favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell E-DG1M sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell E-DG1M 844% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 45% better power draw (3,300 vs 1,800 W)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 94% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 529,412 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 18% better noise (55.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE Max 16% better weight (13.5 vs 16.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 83% more heat output (11,260 vs 6,142 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 12% more home mining score (50.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell E-DG1M |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $799 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$4.32 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$2,376 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$3,953 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$5,529 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell E-DG1MScore: 56/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-DG1M529,411.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell E-DG1M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell E-DG1M is more profitable at $-4.32/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell E-DG1M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell E-DG1M is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell E-DG1M?
The Goldshell E-DG1M scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 50/100 for the Goldshell AE Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell E-DG1M: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell E-DG1M runs at 529,411.8 J/TH — a difference of 8,637,254.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 94% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 529,412 J/TH).