Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Ebang Ebit E12+

Ebang Ebit E12+

Hashrate 50.0 TH/s Power 2,500 W Efficiency 50.0 J/TH
VS
Whatsminer M63S

Whatsminer M63S

Hashrate 390.0 TH/s Power 7,215 W Efficiency 18.5 J/TH

Ebang Ebit E12+ vs Whatsminer M63S

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Ebang Ebit E12+ Specification Whatsminer M63S
50.0 TH/s Hashrate 390.0 TH/s
2,500 W Power Consumption 7,215 W
50.0 J/TH Efficiency 18.5 J/TH
Noise Level 50 dB
10,500.0 kg Weight 28.0 kg
8,530 BTU/hr BTU Output 24,618 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 44/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Ebang Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Ebang Ebit E12+

Daily Revenue 0.00002301 BTC $1.80
Daily Electricity -$6.00
Daily Profit -$4.20
Monthly -$126.02
Yearly -$1,533.25

Whatsminer M63S

Daily Revenue 0.00017947 BTC $14.03
Daily Electricity -$17.32
Daily Profit -$3.28
Monthly -$98.44
Yearly -$1,197.69

Based on BTC price of $78,200 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Whatsminer M63S, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 680% more hashrate (50.0 vs 390.0 TH/s). The Ebang Ebit E12+ claws back ground on power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Whatsminer M63S — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Ebang Ebit E12+ and Whatsminer M63S actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Whatsminer M63S 680% more hashrate (50.0 vs 390.0 TH/s)
  • Ebang Ebit E12+ 65% better power draw (2,500 vs 7,215 W)
  • Whatsminer M63S 63% better efficiency (50.0 vs 18.5 J/TH)
  • Whatsminer M63S 100% better weight (10,500.0 vs 28.0 kg)
  • Whatsminer M63S 189% more heat output (8,530 vs 24,618 BTU/hr)
  • Whatsminer M63S 69% more home mining score (26.0 vs 44.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Ebang Ebit E12+ Metric Whatsminer M63S
Upfront cost (MSRP) $12,000
-$4.20 Daily net profit -$3.28
-$1,533 Net after 1 year -$13,198
-$3,066 Net after 2 years -$14,395
-$4,600 Net after 3 years -$15,593
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Whatsminer M63S

Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Whatsminer M63S

18.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Ebang Ebit E12+ or the Whatsminer M63S?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M63S is more profitable at $-3.28/day compared to $-4.20/day for the Ebang Ebit E12+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Ebang Ebit E12+ vs Whatsminer M63S: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Whatsminer M63S is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Ebang Ebit E12+ at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Ebang Ebit E12+ vs Whatsminer M63S: which fits a residential setup better?

The Whatsminer M63S scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Ebang Ebit E12+). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Ebang Ebit E12+ and Whatsminer M63S?

The Ebang Ebit E12+ runs at 50.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M63S runs at 18.5 J/TH — a difference of 31.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 63% better efficiency (50.0 vs 18.5 J/TH).