IceRiver KS0 vs Bitmain KAS KS7
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS0 | Specification | Bitmain KAS KS7 |
|---|---|---|
| 100.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 40.0 TH/s |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 3,080 W |
| 650.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 77.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 16.4 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,509 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS0
Bitmain KAS KS7
Based on BTC price of $78,183 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain KAS KS7 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 39900% more hashrate (0.1 vs 40.0 TH/s). The IceRiver KS0 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the IceRiver KS0 and Bitmain KAS KS7 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain KAS KS7 39900% more hashrate (0.1 vs 40.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 98% better power draw (65.0 vs 3,080.0 W)
- Bitmain KAS KS7 88% better efficiency (650.0 vs 77.0 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS0 53% better noise (35.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS0 85% better weight (2.5 vs 16.4 kg)
- Bitmain KAS KS7 4638% more heat output (222 vs 10,509 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS0 97% more home mining score (71.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| IceRiver KS0 | Metric | Bitmain KAS KS7 |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,590 |
| -$0.15 | Daily net profit | -$5.95 |
| -$155 | Net after 1 year | -$3,763 |
| -$210 | Net after 2 years | -$5,936 |
| -$266 | Net after 3 years | -$8,108 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS0Score: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain KAS KS777.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS0 or the Bitmain KAS KS7?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-5.95/day for the Bitmain KAS KS7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the IceRiver KS0 or the Bitmain KAS KS7 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The IceRiver KS0 is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Bitmain KAS KS7 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the IceRiver KS0 or Bitmain KAS KS7?
The IceRiver KS0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Bitmain KAS KS7). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between IceRiver KS0 and Bitmain KAS KS7?
The IceRiver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH while the Bitmain KAS KS7 runs at 77.0 J/TH — a difference of 573.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 88% better efficiency (650.0 vs 77.0 J/TH).