IceRiver KS1 vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS1 | Specification | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 10.5 TH/s |
| 600 W | Power Consumption | 3,600 W |
| 600.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 342.9 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 2,047 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,283 BTU/hr |
| 51/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS1
Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 950% more hashrate (1.0 vs 10.5 TH/s) in the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)'s favour. The IceRiver KS1 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the IceRiver KS1 and Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) sit on each measurable spec:
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 950% more hashrate (1.0 vs 10.5 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS1 83% better power draw (600 vs 3,600 W)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 43% better efficiency (600 vs 343 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS1 13% better noise (65.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 3% better weight (15.0 vs 14.5 kg)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 500% more heat output (2,047 vs 12,283 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS1 70% more home mining score (51.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| IceRiver KS1 | Metric | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,540 |
| -$1.40 | Daily net profit | -$8.26 |
| -$3,012 | Net after 1 year | -$8,556 |
| -$3,525 | Net after 2 years | -$11,571 |
| -$4,037 | Net after 3 years | -$14,587 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS1Score: 51/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)342.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver KS1 vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-8.26/day for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the IceRiver KS1 or the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The IceRiver KS1 is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the IceRiver KS1 or Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)?
The IceRiver KS1 scores 51/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
IceRiver KS1 vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The IceRiver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH while the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) runs at 342.9 J/TH — a difference of 257.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 43% better efficiency (600 vs 343 J/TH).