IceRiver KS3 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS3 | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 8.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 200.0 GH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
| 400.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 500.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS3
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the IceRiver KS3 wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). The standout gap is 3900% more hashrate (8.0 vs 0.2 TH/s) in the IceRiver KS3's favour. That said, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the IceRiver KS3 and Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro sit on each measurable spec:
- IceRiver KS3 3900% more hashrate (8.0 vs 0.2 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 97% better power draw (3,200 vs 100 W)
- IceRiver KS3 20% better efficiency (400 vs 500 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 83% better weight (14.4 vs 2.5 kg)
- IceRiver KS3 3100% more heat output (10,918 vs 341 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| IceRiver KS3 | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $79 |
| -$7.39 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$12,698 | Net after 1 year | -$164 |
| -$15,396 | Net after 2 years | -$249 |
| -$18,094 | Net after 3 years | -$334 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS3400.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver KS3 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-7.39/day for the IceRiver KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the IceRiver KS3 or Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro?
The IceRiver KS3 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the IceRiver KS3 or the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
IceRiver KS3 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The IceRiver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH — a difference of 100.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 20% better efficiency (400 vs 500 J/TH).