IceRiver KS3 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS3 | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 8.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 400.0 GH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
| 400.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS3
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 97% better power draw (3,200 vs 100 W). The IceRiver KS3 holds the edge in hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The IceRiver KS3 and Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- IceRiver KS3 1900% more hashrate (8.0 vs 0.4 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 97% better power draw (3,200 vs 100 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 38% better efficiency (400 vs 250 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 53% better noise (75.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 83% better weight (14.4 vs 2.5 kg)
- IceRiver KS3 3100% more heat output (10,918 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 97% more home mining score (36.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| IceRiver KS3 | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $77 |
| -$7.39 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$12,698 | Net after 1 year | -$159 |
| -$15,396 | Net after 2 years | -$242 |
| -$18,095 | Net after 3 years | -$324 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS0 UltraScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS3 or the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-7.39/day for the IceRiver KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
IceRiver KS3 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the IceRiver KS3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the IceRiver KS3 or the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between IceRiver KS3 and Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra?
The IceRiver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 150.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 38% better efficiency (400 vs 250 J/TH).