IceRiver KS3L vs Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS3L | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 4.2 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 500 W |
| 640.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 119.1 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 4.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS3L
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 84% better power draw (3,200 vs 500 W) in the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite's favour. The IceRiver KS3L claws back ground on hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver KS3L and Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- IceRiver KS3L 19% more hashrate (5.0 vs 4.2 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 84% better power draw (3,200 vs 500 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 81% better efficiency (640 vs 119 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 72% better weight (14.4 vs 4.0 kg)
- IceRiver KS3L 540% more heat output (10,918 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 72% more home mining score (36.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| IceRiver KS3L | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $7,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $699 |
| -$7.50 | Daily net profit | -$1.05 |
| -$10,237 | Net after 1 year | -$1,082 |
| -$12,975 | Net after 2 years | -$1,465 |
| -$15,712 | Net after 3 years | -$1,847 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS7 LiteScore: 62/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite119.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the IceRiver KS3L or Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is more profitable at $-1.05/day compared to $-7.50/day for the IceRiver KS3L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the IceRiver KS3L or Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is quieter at 50 dB compared to the IceRiver KS3L at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the IceRiver KS3L or Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS3L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between IceRiver KS3L and Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite?
The IceRiver KS3L runs at 640.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite runs at 119.1 J/TH — a difference of 521.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficiency (640 vs 119 J/TH).