IceRiver KS3M vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS3M | Specification | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 10.5 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Power Consumption | 3,600 W |
| 566.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 342.9 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,283 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS3M
Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 75% more hashrate (6.0 vs 10.5 TH/s) in the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)'s favour. The IceRiver KS3M holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the IceRiver KS3M and Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) sit on each measurable spec:
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 75% more hashrate (6.0 vs 10.5 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS3M 6% better power draw (3,400 vs 3,600 W)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 39% better efficiency (567 vs 343 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS3M 1% better weight (14.4 vs 14.5 kg)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 6% more heat output (11,601 vs 12,283 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS3M 20% more home mining score (36.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| IceRiver KS3M | Metric | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| $8,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,540 |
| -$7.94 | Daily net profit | -$8.26 |
| -$11,400 | Net after 1 year | -$8,556 |
| -$14,299 | Net after 2 years | -$11,572 |
| -$17,199 | Net after 3 years | -$14,587 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS3MScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)342.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the IceRiver KS3M or Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS3M is more profitable at $-7.94/day compared to $-8.26/day for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the IceRiver KS3M or the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the IceRiver KS3M or Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)?
The IceRiver KS3M scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the IceRiver KS3M and Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) on J/TH?
The IceRiver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH while the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) runs at 342.9 J/TH — a difference of 223.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 39% better efficiency (567 vs 343 J/TH).