Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) vs Whatsminer M60
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) | Specification | Whatsminer M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 137.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 170.0 TH/s |
| 3 W | Power Consumption | 3,383 W |
| 18.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 19.9 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| — | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 9 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,543 BTU/hr |
| — | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Intel | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)
Whatsminer M60
Based on BTC price of $79,143 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Scored side by side, the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) and Whatsminer M60 trade blows evenly. Neither pulls ahead decisively, so the deciding factor is which spec matters most to your setup — the panels above lay that out.
Spec Deltas
The Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) and Whatsminer M60 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M60 123988% more hashrate (0.1 vs 170.0 TH/s)
- Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) 100% better power draw (2.5 vs 3,383.0 W)
- Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) 8% better efficiency (18.3 vs 19.9 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M60 135698% more heat output (8.5 vs 11,542.8 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) | Metric | Whatsminer M60 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,800 |
| -$0.00 | Daily net profit | -$1.93 |
| -$0 | Net after 1 year | -$5,504 |
| -$1 | Net after 2 years | -$6,207 |
| -$1 | Net after 3 years | -$6,911 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M60Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)18.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) vs Whatsminer M60: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-1.93/day for the Whatsminer M60. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) or Whatsminer M60?
The Whatsminer M60 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) vs Whatsminer M60: which fits a residential setup better?
The Whatsminer M60 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) vs Whatsminer M60: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) runs at 18.3 J/TH while the Whatsminer M60 runs at 19.9 J/TH — a difference of 1.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 8% better efficiency (18.3 vs 19.9 J/TH).