SuperScalar K10 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| SuperScalar K10 | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 45.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 400.0 GH/s |
| 1,845 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
| 41,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 8.3 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 6,295 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| SuperScalar | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
SuperScalar K10
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Based on BTC price of $78,124 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra edges it: 6 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 99% better efficiency (41,000 vs 250 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The SuperScalar K10 and Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 789% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.4 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 95% better power draw (1,845 vs 100 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 99% better efficiency (41,000 vs 250 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 70% better weight (8.3 vs 2.5 kg)
- SuperScalar K10 1745% more heat output (6,295 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 154% more home mining score (28.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| SuperScalar K10 | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| $5,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $77 |
| -$4.43 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$6,816 | Net after 1 year | -$159 |
| -$8,431 | Net after 2 years | -$242 |
| -$10,047 | Net after 3 years | -$324 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS0 UltraScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
SuperScalar K10 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-4.43/day for the SuperScalar K10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the SuperScalar K10 or Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the SuperScalar K10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the SuperScalar K10 or Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the SuperScalar K10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between SuperScalar K10 and Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra?
The SuperScalar K10 runs at 41,000.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 40,750.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficiency (41,000 vs 250 J/TH).