SuperScalar K10 vs Bitmain KAS KS7
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| SuperScalar K10 | Specification | Bitmain KAS KS7 |
|---|---|---|
| 45.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 40.0 TH/s |
| 1,845 W | Power Consumption | 3,080 W |
| 41,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 77.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 8.3 kg | Weight | 16.4 kg |
| 6,295 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,509 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| SuperScalar | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
SuperScalar K10
Bitmain KAS KS7
Based on BTC price of $78,178 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain KAS KS7, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 88789% more hashrate (0.0 vs 40.0 TH/s). The SuperScalar K10 claws back ground on power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the SuperScalar K10 and Bitmain KAS KS7 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain KAS KS7 88789% more hashrate (0.0 vs 40.0 TH/s)
- SuperScalar K10 40% better power draw (1,845 vs 3,080 W)
- Bitmain KAS KS7 100% better efficiency (41,000.0 vs 77.0 J/TH)
- SuperScalar K10 49% better weight (8.3 vs 16.4 kg)
- Bitmain KAS KS7 67% more heat output (6,295 vs 10,509 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain KAS KS7 29% more home mining score (28.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| SuperScalar K10 | Metric | Bitmain KAS KS7 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,590 |
| -$4.43 | Daily net profit | -$5.95 |
| -$6,816 | Net after 1 year | -$3,763 |
| -$8,431 | Net after 2 years | -$5,936 |
| -$10,047 | Net after 3 years | -$8,108 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain KAS KS7Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain KAS KS777.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the SuperScalar K10 or Bitmain KAS KS7 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the SuperScalar K10 is more profitable at $-4.43/day compared to $-5.95/day for the Bitmain KAS KS7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the SuperScalar K10 or the Bitmain KAS KS7 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitmain KAS KS7 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the SuperScalar K10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the SuperScalar K10 or Bitmain KAS KS7?
The Bitmain KAS KS7 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the SuperScalar K10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
SuperScalar K10 vs Bitmain KAS KS7: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The SuperScalar K10 runs at 41,000.0 J/TH while the Bitmain KAS KS7 runs at 77.0 J/TH — a difference of 40,923.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (41,000.0 vs 77.0 J/TH).