SuperScalar K10 vs Iceriver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| SuperScalar K10 | Specification | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 45.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 6.0 TH/s |
| 1,845 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 41,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 8.3 kg | Weight | 17.1 kg |
| 6,295 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| SuperScalar | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
SuperScalar K10
Iceriver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KS3M, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 13233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.0 TH/s) in the Iceriver KS3M's favour. The SuperScalar K10 claws back ground on power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The SuperScalar K10 and Iceriver KS3M diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver KS3M 13233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- SuperScalar K10 46% better power draw (1,845 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KS3M 99% better efficiency (41,000 vs 567 J/TH)
- SuperScalar K10 51% better weight (8.3 vs 17.1 kg)
- Iceriver KS3M 84% more heat output (6,295 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS3M 29% more home mining score (28.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| SuperScalar K10 | Metric | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| $5,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $320 |
| -$4.43 | Daily net profit | -$7.94 |
| -$6,816 | Net after 1 year | -$3,220 |
| -$8,431 | Net after 2 years | -$6,119 |
| -$10,047 | Net after 3 years | -$9,019 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS3MScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS3M566.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
SuperScalar K10 vs Iceriver KS3M: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the SuperScalar K10 is more profitable at $-4.43/day compared to $-7.94/day for the Iceriver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the SuperScalar K10 or Iceriver KS3M?
The Iceriver KS3M is quieter at 75 dB compared to the SuperScalar K10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
SuperScalar K10 vs Iceriver KS3M: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KS3M scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the SuperScalar K10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between SuperScalar K10 and Iceriver KS3M?
The SuperScalar K10 runs at 41,000.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 40,433.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficiency (41,000 vs 567 J/TH).