SuperScalar K10 vs Iceriver KS5L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| SuperScalar K10 | Specification | Iceriver KS5L |
|---|---|---|
| 45.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 12.0 TH/s |
| 1,845 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 41,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 283.3 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 8.3 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 6,295 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| SuperScalar | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
SuperScalar K10
Iceriver KS5L
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KS5L, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 26567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 12.0 TH/s) in the Iceriver KS5L's favour. The SuperScalar K10 claws back ground on power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the SuperScalar K10 and Iceriver KS5L sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KS5L 26567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- SuperScalar K10 46% better power draw (1,845 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KS5L 99% better efficiency (41,000 vs 283 J/TH)
- SuperScalar K10 45% better weight (8.3 vs 15.0 kg)
- Iceriver KS5L 84% more heat output (6,295 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS5L 29% more home mining score (28.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| SuperScalar K10 | Metric | Iceriver KS5L |
|---|---|---|
| $5,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $400 |
| -$4.43 | Daily net profit | -$7.73 |
| -$6,816 | Net after 1 year | -$3,221 |
| -$8,431 | Net after 2 years | -$6,041 |
| -$10,047 | Net after 3 years | -$8,862 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS5LScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS5L283.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the SuperScalar K10 or Iceriver KS5L more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the SuperScalar K10 is more profitable at $-4.43/day compared to $-7.73/day for the Iceriver KS5L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
SuperScalar K10 vs Iceriver KS5L: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver KS5L is quieter at 75 dB compared to the SuperScalar K10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
SuperScalar K10 vs Iceriver KS5L: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KS5L scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the SuperScalar K10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the SuperScalar K10 and Iceriver KS5L on J/TH?
The SuperScalar K10 runs at 41,000.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS5L runs at 283.3 J/TH — a difference of 40,716.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficiency (41,000 vs 283 J/TH).