Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 200.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 400.0 GH/s |
| 100 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
| 500.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra edges it: 5 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 50% better efficiency (500 vs 250 J/TH) in the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra's favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro and Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 100% more hashrate (0.2 vs 0.4 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 50% better efficiency (500 vs 250 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 97% more home mining score (36.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| $79 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $77 |
| -$0.23 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$164 | Net after 1 year | -$159 |
| -$249 | Net after 2 years | -$242 |
| -$334 | Net after 3 years | -$324 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS0 UltraScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro or Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-0.23/day for the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro or the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro and Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 250.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 50% better efficiency (500 vs 250 J/TH).
