Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro vs Iceriver KS2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro | Specification | Iceriver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| 200.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 2.0 TH/s |
| 100 W | Power Consumption | 1,200 W |
| 500.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 45/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Iceriver KS2
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KS2 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 900% more hashrate (0.2 vs 2.0 TH/s) in the Iceriver KS2's favour. The Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro holds the edge in efficiency and power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro and Iceriver KS2 sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KS2 900% more hashrate (0.2 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 92% better power draw (100 vs 1,200 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 17% better efficiency (500 vs 600 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 83% better weight (2.5 vs 14.9 kg)
- Iceriver KS2 1100% more heat output (341 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS2 25% more home mining score (36.0 vs 45.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro | Metric | Iceriver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| $79 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$0.23 | Daily net profit | -$2.81 |
| -$164 | Net after 1 year | -$1,424 |
| -$249 | Net after 2 years | -$2,449 |
| -$334 | Net after 3 years | -$3,474 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS2Score: 45/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro vs Iceriver KS2: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-2.81/day for the Iceriver KS2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro or Iceriver KS2?
The Iceriver KS2 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro or the Iceriver KS2?
The Iceriver KS2 scores 45/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro and Iceriver KS2 on J/TH?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 100.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 17% better efficiency (500 vs 600 J/TH).