Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra vs Iceriver KS0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra | Specification | Iceriver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| 400.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 100.0 GH/s |
| 100 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| 250.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 650.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Iceriver KS0
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 300% more hashrate (0.4 vs 0.1 TH/s). That said, the Iceriver KS0 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra and Iceriver KS0 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 300% more hashrate (0.4 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS0 35% better power draw (100.0 vs 65.0 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 62% better efficiency (250 vs 650 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 54% more heat output (341 vs 222 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 97% more home mining score (71.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra | Metric | Iceriver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| $77 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$0.23 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$159 | Net after 1 year | -$56 |
| -$242 | Net after 2 years | -$111 |
| -$324 | Net after 3 years | -$167 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS0 UltraScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra vs Iceriver KS0: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-0.23/day for the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra or Iceriver KS0?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver KS0 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra vs Iceriver KS0: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KS0). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra and Iceriver KS0?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra runs at 250.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 400.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 62% better efficiency (250 vs 650 J/TH).