Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra vs Iceriver KS5L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra | Specification | Iceriver KS5L |
|---|---|---|
| 400.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 12.0 TH/s |
| 100 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 250.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 283.3 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Iceriver KS5L
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 97% better power draw (100 vs 3,400 W) in the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra's favour. The Iceriver KS5L claws back ground on hashrate and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra and Iceriver KS5L sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KS5L 2900% more hashrate (0.4 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 97% better power draw (100 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 12% better efficiency (250 vs 283 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 53% better noise (35.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 83% better weight (2.5 vs 15.0 kg)
- Iceriver KS5L 3300% more heat output (341 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 97% more home mining score (71.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra | Metric | Iceriver KS5L |
|---|---|---|
| $77 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $400 |
| -$0.23 | Daily net profit | -$7.73 |
| -$159 | Net after 1 year | -$3,221 |
| -$242 | Net after 2 years | -$6,042 |
| -$324 | Net after 3 years | -$8,863 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS0 UltraScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra or Iceriver KS5L more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-7.73/day for the Iceriver KS5L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra or Iceriver KS5L?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver KS5L at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra or the Iceriver KS5L?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KS5L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra and Iceriver KS5L on J/TH?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra runs at 250.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS5L runs at 283.3 J/TH — a difference of 33.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 12% better efficiency (250 vs 283 J/TH).