Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite | Specification | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2 TH/s | Hashrate | 10.5 TH/s |
| 500 W | Power Consumption | 3,600 W |
| 119.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 342.9 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 4.0 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 1,706 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,283 BTU/hr |
| 62/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 86% better power draw (500 vs 3,600 W) in the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite's favour. The Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) claws back ground on hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite and Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) sit on each measurable spec:
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 150% more hashrate (4.2 vs 10.5 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 86% better power draw (500 vs 3,600 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 65% better efficiency (119 vs 343 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 33% better noise (50.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 72% better weight (4.0 vs 14.5 kg)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 620% more heat output (1,706 vs 12,283 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 107% more home mining score (62.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite | Metric | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| $699 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,540 |
| -$1.05 | Daily net profit | -$8.26 |
| -$1,082 | Net after 1 year | -$8,556 |
| -$1,465 | Net after 2 years | -$11,572 |
| -$1,848 | Net after 3 years | -$14,587 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS7 LiteScore: 62/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite119.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is more profitable at $-1.05/day compared to $-8.26/day for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite or the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T): which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite runs at 119.1 J/TH while the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) runs at 342.9 J/TH — a difference of 223.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 65% better efficiency (119 vs 343 J/TH).