Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite vs Dragonball Miner KS6
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite | Specification | Dragonball Miner KS6 |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2 TH/s | Hashrate | 11.0 TH/s |
| 500 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 119.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 309.1 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 4.0 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 1,706 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 62/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Dragonball Miner KS6
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 85% better power draw (500 vs 3,400 W). The Dragonball Miner KS6 claws back ground on hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite and Dragonball Miner KS6 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Dragonball Miner KS6 162% more hashrate (4.2 vs 11.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 85% better power draw (500 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 61% better efficiency (119 vs 309 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 33% better noise (50.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 72% better weight (4.0 vs 14.5 kg)
- Dragonball Miner KS6 580% more heat output (1,706 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 72% more home mining score (62.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite | Metric | Dragonball Miner KS6 |
|---|---|---|
| $699 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,820 |
| -$1.05 | Daily net profit | -$7.76 |
| -$1,082 | Net after 1 year | -$6,654 |
| -$1,465 | Net after 2 years | -$9,488 |
| -$1,847 | Net after 3 years | -$12,322 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS7 LiteScore: 62/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite119.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite vs Dragonball Miner KS6: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is more profitable at $-1.05/day compared to $-7.76/day for the Dragonball Miner KS6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite or the Dragonball Miner KS6 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Dragonball Miner KS6 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite or Dragonball Miner KS6?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Dragonball Miner KS6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite vs Dragonball Miner KS6: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite runs at 119.1 J/TH while the Dragonball Miner KS6 runs at 309.1 J/TH — a difference of 190.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 61% better efficiency (119 vs 309 J/TH).