Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bitmain KAS KS7

Bitmain KAS KS7

Hashrate 40.0 TH/s Power 3,080 W Efficiency 77.0 J/TH
VS
Iceriver KS2

Iceriver KS2

Hashrate 2.0 TH/s Power 1,200 W Efficiency 600.0 J/TH

Bitmain KAS KS7 vs Iceriver KS2

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain KAS KS7 Specification Iceriver KS2
40.0 TH/s Hashrate 2.0 TH/s
3,080 W Power Consumption 1,200 W
77.0 J/TH Efficiency 600.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
16.4 kg Weight 14.9 kg
10,509 BTU/hr BTU Output 4,094 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 45/100
Release Year
KHeavyHash Algorithm KHeavyHash
Bitmain Manufacturer IceRiver

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain KAS KS7

Daily Revenue 0.00001841 BTC $1.44
Daily Electricity -$7.39
Daily Profit -$5.95
Monthly -$178.60
Yearly -$2,173.00

Iceriver KS2

Daily Revenue 0.00000092 BTC $0.07
Daily Electricity -$2.88
Daily Profit -$2.81
Monthly -$84.24
Yearly -$1,024.95

Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain KAS KS7 edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 1900% more hashrate (40.0 vs 2.0 TH/s). The Iceriver KS2 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Bitmain KAS KS7 — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain KAS KS7 and Iceriver KS2 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Bitmain KAS KS7 1900% more hashrate (40.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
  • Iceriver KS2 61% better power draw (3,080 vs 1,200 W)
  • Bitmain KAS KS7 87% better efficiency (77.0 vs 600.0 J/TH)
  • Iceriver KS2 9% better weight (16.4 vs 14.9 kg)
  • Bitmain KAS KS7 157% more heat output (10,509 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
  • Iceriver KS2 25% more home mining score (36.0 vs 45.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Bitmain KAS KS7 Metric Iceriver KS2
$1,590 Upfront cost (MSRP) $399
-$5.95 Daily net profit -$2.81
-$3,763 Net after 1 year -$1,424
-$5,936 Net after 2 years -$2,449
-$8,109 Net after 3 years -$3,474
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Iceriver KS2

Score: 45/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain KAS KS7

77.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Bitmain KAS KS7 or Iceriver KS2 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS2 is more profitable at $-2.81/day compared to $-5.95/day for the Bitmain KAS KS7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Bitmain KAS KS7 vs Iceriver KS2: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Bitmain KAS KS7 vs Iceriver KS2: which fits a residential setup better?

The Iceriver KS2 scores 45/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Bitmain KAS KS7). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Bitmain KAS KS7 vs Iceriver KS2: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Bitmain KAS KS7 runs at 77.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 523.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficiency (77.0 vs 600.0 J/TH).